On 15/6/2016 11:14 AM, Jan Viktorin wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 08:47:02 +0100
> David Hunt <david.hunt at intel.com> wrote:
>
[...]
>
>> +
>> +/** Array of registered ops structs. */
>> +extern struct rte_mempool_ops_table rte_mempool_ops_table;
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * @internal Get the mempool ops struct from its index.
>> + *
>> + * @param ops_index
>> + * The index of the ops struct in the ops struct table. It must be a valid
>> + * index: (0 <= idx < num_ops).
>> + * @return
>> + * The pointer to the ops struct in the table.
>> + */
>> +static inline struct rte_mempool_ops *
>> +rte_mempool_ops_get(int ops_index)
> Shouldn't this function be called rte_mempool_get/find_ops instead?
>
>
Jan,
I think at this stage that it's probably OK as it is. :)
Rgds,
Dave.
