Now that we're moving to an external mempoool handler, which
uses a void *pool_data as a pointer to the pool data, remove the
unneeded ring pointer from the mempool struct.
Signed-off-by: David Hunt <david.hunt at intel.com>
---
app/test/test_mempool_perf.c | 1 -
lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_mempool_perf.c b/app/test/test_mempool_perf.c
index cdc02a0..091c1df 100644
--- a/app/test/test_mempool_perf.c
+++ b/app/test/test_mempool_perf.c
@@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ per_lcore_mempool_test(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
n_get_bulk);
if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
rte_mempool_dump(stdout, mp);
- rte_ring_dump(stdout, mp->ring);
/* in this case, objects are lost... */
return -1;
}
diff --git a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
index a6b28b0..c33eeb8 100644
--- a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
+++ b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
@@ -204,7 +204,6 @@ struct rte_mempool_memhdr {
*/
struct rte_mempool {
char name[RTE_MEMPOOL_NAMESIZE]; /**< Name of mempool. */
- struct rte_ring *ring; /**< Ring to store objects. */
union {
void *pool_data; /**< Ring or pool to store objects */
uint64_t pool_id; /**< External mempool identifier */
--
2.5.5
