On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 07:10:54PM +0200, Jan M?dala wrote:
> Let me point it this way:
> ??This patch fixes: [dpdk-dev,v3,1/6] ena: update of ENA communication layer
>
> Jan
Since it fixes another patch in the same series, I think the two patches could
actually be merged, rather than adding code with a known issue and later having
a two-line(ish) patch to fix it.
I will merge the two on apply, if there is no objection.
/Bruce
>
> 2016-07-05 19:04 GMT+02:00 Jan M?dala <jan at semihalf.com>:
>
> > Uhm, wait, I think that sha is wrong, please let me check it double time.
> >
> > Jan
> >
> > 2016-07-05 19:03 GMT+02:00 Jan M?dala <jan at semihalf.com>:
> >
> >> Bruce,
> >>
> >>
> >> That'd be very kind of you if you can fix trailing zeros.
> >>
> >>
> >> This patch
> >>
> >> Fixes: b5b8cd9 ("ena: update of ENA communication layer")
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >> 2016-07-05 18:19 GMT+02:00 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at
> >> intel.com>:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 09:52:09AM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> >>> > On 6/30/2016 4:04 PM, Jan Medala wrote:
> >>> > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Matushevsky <matua at amazon.com>
> >>> > > Signed-off-by: Jakub Palider <jpa at semihalf.com>
> >>> > > Signed-off-by: Jan Medala <jan at semihalf.com>
> >>> >
> >>> > The compilation error to fix is [1], it may be good to add what to fix
> >>> > into commit log.
> >>> >
> >>> > [1]
> >>> > == Build drivers/net/ena
> >>> > CC ena_ethdev.o
> >>> > /tmp/dpdk_maintain/ena_v3/dpdk/drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c(943): error
> >>> > #188: enumerated type mixed with another type
> >>> > struct ena_com_create_io_ctx ctx = { 0 };
> >>> > ^
> >>> >
> >>> > /tmp/dpdk_maintain/ena_v3/dpdk/drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c(1036):
> >>> error
> >>> > #188: enumerated type mixed with another type
> >>> > struct ena_com_create_io_ctx ctx = { 0 };
> >>> > ^
> >>> > ...
> >>> >
> >>> > > --- a/drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c
> >>> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c
> >>> > > @@ -940,7 +940,10 @@ static int ena_tx_queue_setup(struct
> >>> rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >>> > > __rte_unused unsigned int socket_id,
> >>> > > __rte_unused const struct rte_eth_txconf
> >>> *tx_conf)
> >>> > > {
> >>> > > - struct ena_com_create_io_ctx ctx = { 0 };
> >>> > > + struct ena_com_create_io_ctx ctx =
> >>> > > + /* policy set to _HOST just to satisfy icc compiler */
> >>> > > + { ENA_ADMIN_PLACEMENT_POLICY_HOST,
> >>> > > + ENA_COM_IO_QUEUE_DIRECTION_TX, 0, 0, 0, 0 };
> >>> >
> >>> > Trailing "0" are not required, compiler will take care of them.
> >>> >
> >>> Jan,
> >>>
> >>> any comment on this? If you want, I can remove the trailing zeros on
> >>> apply
> >>> rather than needing a V3. Is that ok?
> >>>
> >>> Again a fixes line is missing, can you supply one.
> >>>
> >>> /Bruce
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
