On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 01:01:02PM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote:
> > Another generic comment about this patchset is that it VERY okay to
> > include several components change in one set, but putting them in
> > order helps review a lot.
> >
> > Say, this patch set has dependence on VFIO stuff, therefore, it'd be
> > much better __IF__ you can put all VFIO related patches first, and
> > then virtio related patches follows, but not in an interleaved way
> > you did. If, for somereason, you can't do that, you should at least
> > try to minimise the chance of interleave.
> >
>
> I agree that, but this patch series dependent on other patches
> including virtio 1.0 and then vfio-noiommu, its was difficult for me
> to keep topic-wise sanity in patch series.
That would not be an issue to me: just apply the dependence patches
first, and build your patches on top of that. You just need mention
the dependence info in your cover-letter.
--yliu
>
> V6 will take care patch ordering. Thanks
Thanks!
--yliu
