The new share code makes fm10k_msg_update_pvid_pf function static, so we can not refer to it now in fm10k_ethdev.c. The registered pf handler is almost the same as the default pf handler, removing it has no impact on mailbox.
Signed-off-by: Wang Xiao W <xiao.w.wang at intel.com> --- drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c | 17 ++--------------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c index e4aed94..2c38ce9 100644 --- a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c +++ b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c @@ -2367,29 +2367,16 @@ static const struct fm10k_msg_data fm10k_msgdata_vf[] = { FM10K_TLV_MSG_ERROR_HANDLER(fm10k_tlv_msg_error), }; -/* Mailbox message handler in PF */ -static const struct fm10k_msg_data fm10k_msgdata_pf[] = { - FM10K_PF_MSG_ERR_HANDLER(XCAST_MODES, fm10k_msg_err_pf), - FM10K_PF_MSG_ERR_HANDLER(UPDATE_MAC_FWD_RULE, fm10k_msg_err_pf), - FM10K_PF_MSG_LPORT_MAP_HANDLER(fm10k_msg_lport_map_pf), - FM10K_PF_MSG_ERR_HANDLER(LPORT_CREATE, fm10k_msg_err_pf), - FM10K_PF_MSG_ERR_HANDLER(LPORT_DELETE, fm10k_msg_err_pf), - FM10K_PF_MSG_UPDATE_PVID_HANDLER(fm10k_msg_update_pvid_pf), - FM10K_TLV_MSG_ERROR_HANDLER(fm10k_tlv_msg_error), -}; - static int fm10k_setup_mbx_service(struct fm10k_hw *hw) { - int err; + int err = 0; /* Initialize mailbox lock */ fm10k_mbx_initlock(hw); /* Replace default message handler with new ones */ - if (hw->mac.type == fm10k_mac_pf) - err = hw->mbx.ops.register_handlers(&hw->mbx, fm10k_msgdata_pf); - else + if (hw->mac.type == fm10k_mac_vf) err = hw->mbx.ops.register_handlers(&hw->mbx, fm10k_msgdata_vf); if (err) { -- 1.9.3