Hi Konstantin,

On 1/6/2016 12:49 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> Hi Jianfeng,
>
>>>> +static int
>>>> +check_packet_type_ok(int portid)
>>>> +{
>>>> +  int i;
>>>> +  int ret;
>>>> +  uint32_t ptypes[RTE_PTYPE_L3_MAX_NUM];
>>>> +  int ptype_l3_ipv4 = 0, ptype_l3_ipv6 = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +  ret = rte_eth_dev_get_ptype_info(portid, RTE_PTYPE_L3_MASK,
>>> ptypes);
>>>> +  for (i = 0; i < ret; ++i) {
>>>> +          if (ptypes[i] & RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4)
>>>> +                  ptype_l3_ipv4 = 1;
>>>> +          if (ptypes[i] & RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV6)
>>>> +                  ptype_l3_ipv6 = 1;
>>>> +  }
>>>> +
>>>> +  if (ptype_l3_ipv4 == 0)
>>>> +          printf("port %d cannot parse RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4\n", portid);
>>>> +
>>>> +  if (ptype_l3_ipv6 == 0)
>>>> +          printf("port %d cannot parse RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV6\n", portid);
>>>> +
>>>> +  if (ptype_l3_ipv4 || ptype_l3_ipv6)
>>>> +          return 1;
>
> Forgot one thing: I think it should be:
>
> if (ptype_l3_ipv4 && ptype_l3_ipv6)
>    return 1;
> return 0;
>
> or just:
>
> return ptype_l3_ipv4 && ptype_l3_ipv6;

My original thought is: PMDs, like vmxnet3, fills ptype_l3_ipv4, but not 
ptype_l3_ipv6.
If we use "&&", then it would add rx callback to parse ptype whether 
ipv4 or ipv6 traffic is comming.

Thanks,
Jianfeng

>
> Konstantin

Reply via email to