On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 03:44:00PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_rxtx.c > b/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_rxtx.c > index 4ac0456..b7486cd 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_rxtx.c > +++ b/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_rxtx.c > @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ vmxnet3_unmap_pkt(uint16_t eop_idx, vmxnet3_tx_queue_t > *txq) > struct rte_mbuf *mbuf; > > /* Release cmd_ring descriptor and free mbuf */ > - VMXNET3_ASSERT(txq->cmd_ring.base[eop_idx].txd.eop == 1); > + RTE_ASSERT(txq->cmd_ring.base[eop_idx].txd.eop == 1); > > mbuf = txq->cmd_ring.buf_info[eop_idx].m; > if (mbuf == NULL) > @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ vmxnet3_unmap_pkt(uint16_t eop_idx, vmxnet3_tx_queue_t > *txq) > > while (txq->cmd_ring.next2comp != eop_idx) { > /* no out-of-order completion */ > - > VMXNET3_ASSERT(txq->cmd_ring.base[txq->cmd_ring.next2comp].txd.cq == 0); > + RTE_ASSERT(txq->cmd_ring.base[txq->cmd_ring.next2comp].txd.cq > == 0); > vmxnet3_cmd_ring_adv_next2comp(&txq->cmd_ring); > completed++; > } > @@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ vmxnet3_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf > **tx_pkts, > if (tso) { > uint16_t mss = txm->tso_segsz; > > - VMXNET3_ASSERT(mss > 0); > + RTE_ASSERT(mss > 0); > > gdesc->txd.hlen = txm->l2_len + txm->l3_len + > txm->l4_len; > gdesc->txd.om = VMXNET3_OM_TSO; > @@ -662,8 +662,8 @@ vmxnet3_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf > **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts) > > PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "rxd idx: %d ring idx: %d.", idx, ring_idx); > > - VMXNET3_ASSERT(rcd->len <= rxd->len); > - VMXNET3_ASSERT(rbi->m); > + RTE_ASSERT(rcd->len <= rxd->len); > + RTE_ASSERT(rbi->m); >
Seems this piece of code introduces a build error: drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_rxtx.c: In function ?vmxnet3_recv_pkts?: drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_rxtx.c:635:18: error: variable ?rxd? set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable] Vmxnet3_RxDesc *rxd; ^ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors make[6]: *** [vmxnet3_rxtx.o] Error 1 --yliu