On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 18:44:36 +0530
<pbhagavat...@marvell.com> wrote:
> +
> +struct sw_vector_adapter_service_data {
> + uint32_t service_id;
> + RTE_ATOMIC(rte_mcslock_t *) lock;
> + RTE_TAILQ_HEAD(, sw_vector_adapter_data) adapter_list;
> +};Do you really need mcslock here? mcslock is for locks where there is large amount of contention and lots of CPU's. This doesn't seem like that.
