On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 18:44:36 +0530
<pbhagavat...@marvell.com> wrote:
> +struct sw_vector_adapter_service_data {
> + uint32_t service_id;
> + RTE_ATOMIC(rte_mcslock_t *) lock;
> + RTE_TAILQ_HEAD(, sw_vector_adapter_data) adapter_list;
> +};Why the indirect pointer to the lock? rather than embedding it in the structure?
