On 2015/09/30 0:10, Kulasek, TomaszX wrote: > Hi Tetsuya, > > Changes from patch below, solves the problem. I've removed malloc. > > Tomasz. > > --- > From e03e77a7dc0e47ac9d750545a834624f88f61966 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Tomasz Kulasek <tomaszx.kulasek at intel.com> > Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 16:48:31 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH 1/4] null: fix segfault when null_pmd added to bonding > > --- > drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c b/drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c > index e244595..b498ef1 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c > +++ b/drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c > @@ -432,6 +432,7 @@ eth_dev_null_create(const char *name, > internals->numa_node = numa_node; > > pci_dev->numa_node = numa_node; > + pci_dev->driver = &rte_null_pmd.pci_drv; > > data->dev_private = internals; > data->port_id = eth_dev->data->port_id; > @@ -445,6 +446,7 @@ eth_dev_null_create(const char *name, > eth_dev->dev_ops = &ops; > eth_dev->pci_dev = pci_dev; > eth_dev->driver = &rte_null_pmd; > + TAILQ_INIT(ð_dev->link_intr_cbs); > > /* finally assign rx and tx ops */ > if (packet_copy) { > @@ -461,6 +463,7 @@ error: > rte_free(data); > rte_free(pci_dev); > rte_free(internals); > + rte_free(eth_dev);
Hi Tomasz, We can remove rte_free(eth_dev), because if eth_dev is allocated correctly, we cannot reach here. I don't see any issues except for it. Thanks, Tetsuya