06/12/2024 19:14, Andre Muezerie: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 04:41:16PM +0000, Konstantin Ananyev wrote: > > > > > > > Macro __SIZEOF_LONG__ is not standardized and MSVC does not define it. > > > > > Therefore the errors below are seen with MSVC: > > > > > > > > > > ../lib/mldev/mldev_utils_scalar.c(465): error C2065: > > > > > '__SIZEOF_LONG__': undeclared identifier > > > > > ../lib/mldev/mldev_utils_scalar.c(478): error C2051: > > > > > case expression not constant > > > > > > > > > > ../lib/mldev/mldev_utils_scalar_bfloat16.c(33): error C2065: > > > > > '__SIZEOF_LONG__': undeclared identifier > > > > > ../lib/mldev/mldev_utils_scalar_bfloat16.c(49): error C2051: > > > > > case expression not constant > > > > > > > > > > Turns out that the places where __SIZEOF_LONG__ is currently > > > > > being used can equally well use sizeof(long) instead. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andre Muezerie <andre...@linux.microsoft.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/bus/fslmc/mc/fsl_mc_cmd.h | 3 +-- > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/fslmc/mc/fsl_mc_cmd.h > > > > > b/drivers/bus/fslmc/mc/fsl_mc_cmd.h > > > > > index a768774c89..f27a18905d 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/bus/fslmc/mc/fsl_mc_cmd.h > > > > > +++ b/drivers/bus/fslmc/mc/fsl_mc_cmd.h > > > > > @@ -29,9 +29,8 @@ > > > > > #define le32_to_cpu rte_le_to_cpu_32 > > > > > #define le16_to_cpu rte_le_to_cpu_16 > > > > > > > > > > -#define BITS_PER_LONG (__SIZEOF_LONG__ * 8) > > > > > #define GENMASK(h, l) \ > > > > > - (((~0UL) << (l)) & (~0UL >> (BITS_PER_LONG - 1 - (h)))) > > > > > + (((~0UL) << (l)) & (~0UL >> (RTE_BITS_PER_LONG - 1 - > > > > > (h)))) > > > > > > > > Inside > > > > There are macros: RTE_GENMASK64 (and RTE_GENMASK32). > > > > Which as I understand does same thing. > > > > Might be better to just use these ones instead of hand-crafting > > > > same thing over different PMDs. > > > > > > > > > > I agree. I can submit a separate patch for that once this series aimed at > > > unblocking MSVC from being used on this code goes in, if that is OK. If > > > instead you feel strongly that this change should be made as part of this > > > series let me know. > > > > I am fine anyway. > > Just thought that doing something like: > > #define GENMASK(h, l) RTE_GENMASK64(h, l) > > Would be less work for you and less code churn. > > > > I thought about that option too, but getting rid of that "redefine" and just > replace all occurrences of GENMASK would be better I think, despite > the code churn.
Yes please, it is better to remove these macros and directly use RTE_ equivalents where needed. Thanks.