On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 10:49 AM David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > For now, this series only focus on fixing subsystems using lcore > > > variables so that those allocations are deferred either in rte_eal_init() > > > or in the path that does require such lcore variables. > > > > > > > > > > An idle question: would this have any consequences in use case of eal > > init -> eal cleanup -> eal init with different arguments? > > Hum, interesting question. > > I would say that initialising lcore variables in constructors means > that this usecase is broken, since lcore variables are freed in > eal_lcore_var_cleanup().
I posted a v2, though this issue you noticed is still present. -- David Marchand
