Hi folks,

I had a look at the graph dispatch mode and wondered if it could be adapted to be used with event loops for "slow path" processing.

The use case I have in mind is having lcores dedicated for control plane operations which are not latency sensitive. It would be nice to allow data plane workers to send packets to these lcores while keeping the packets in the graph.

The problem I have with this solution for now, is that all CPUs processing the graph with rte_graph_walk_mcore_dispatch() are supposed to do busy polling. This is not compatible with select/epoll based event loops.

Would it be possible to have a way for busy-polling threads to signal non-busy-polling threads that there are packets waiting for them in the graph ring? In grout, we implemented something outside of the graph using pthread_cond_signal().

https://github.com/DPDK/grout/blob/main/modules/infra/datapath/control_output.c
https://github.com/DPDK/grout/blob/main/modules/infra/control/control_output.c

Unless I am mistaken, this does not perform any syscall and does not require acquiring any lock. Only the "slow" thread needs to acquire locks and wait for the data path threads to call pthread_cond_signal().

This solution can only be used for busy-polling -> epoll-based communication, for the other direction epoll-based -> busy-polling there would not need any specific signaling required. Only posting the packets to the graph ring would be enough.

What do you think? How would you integrate this into rte_graph? What would the API look like in your opinion?

Thanks!

--
Robin

Reply via email to