On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 03:22:51 +0300
Isaac Boukris <ibouk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/lib/eal/windows/eal_timer.c b/lib/eal/windows/eal_timer.c
> index b070cb7751..cfd6c267ac 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/windows/eal_timer.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/windows/eal_timer.c
> @@ -49,13 +49,16 @@ rte_delay_us_sleep(unsigned int us)
> }
>
> uint64_t
> -get_tsc_freq(void)
> +get_tsc_freq(uint64_t arch_hz)
> {
> LARGE_INTEGER t_start, t_end, elapsed_us;
> LARGE_INTEGER frequency;
> uint64_t tsc_hz;
> uint64_t end, start;
>
> + if (arch_hz)
> + return arch_hz;
> +
> QueryPerformanceFrequency(&frequency);
>
> QueryPerformanceCounter(&t_start);
> --
On Windows, I would not use arch_hz at all, since it is opaque how
the Windows kernel determines the frequency, and best not to get
skew.
