On 21/10/2015 14:01, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> On 21/10/2015 11:50, Reshma Pattan wrote:
>> The reorder library unit test was performed under the assumption that
>> the start
>> sequence number was always 0.
>> This is not the case anymore as the start sequence number is
>> initialized by the first
>> packet inserted into the reorder buffer.
>>
>> This patch updates the unit test to reflect the new behavior.
>>
>> Fixes: 7e1fa1de8a53 ("reorder: allow random number as starting point")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Reshma Pattan<reshma.pattan at intel.com>
>>
>> ---
>> Version 2:
>> split patch for unit test only
>> update commit message
>>
>> app/test/test_reorder.c | 75
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>> 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>>
>>
> Acked-by: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy at intel.com>
Forgot to add this tag:
Reported-by: Mukesh Dua <mukesh.dua81 at gmail.com>
Sergio
