2015-10-30 14:30, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy:
> On 21/10/2015 14:01, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> > On 21/10/2015 11:50, Reshma Pattan wrote:
> >> The reorder library unit test was performed under the assumption that
> >> the start
> >> sequence number was always 0.
> >> This is not the case anymore as the start sequence number is
> >> initialized by the first
> >> packet inserted into the reorder buffer.
> >>
> >> This patch updates the unit test to reflect the new behavior.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 7e1fa1de8a53 ("reorder: allow random number as starting point")
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Reshma Pattan<reshma.pattan at intel.com>
> >>
> > Acked-by: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy at intel.com>
> Forgot to add this tag:
>
> Reported-by: Mukesh Dua <mukesh.dua81 at gmail.com>
Applied, thanks
