On 7/1/24 23:27, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
New k0 added in LDPC decoder structure can be parsed by the bbdev test application. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chau...@intel.com> --- app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 7 +++++-- app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.c | 4 ++++ app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c index 3a94f15a30..67c55605fd 100644 --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c @@ -1923,6 +1923,7 @@ copy_reference_ldpc_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op **ops, unsigned int n, ops[i]->ldpc_dec.n_cb = ldpc_dec->n_cb; ops[i]->ldpc_dec.iter_max = ldpc_dec->iter_max; ops[i]->ldpc_dec.rv_index = ldpc_dec->rv_index; + ops[i]->ldpc_dec.k0 = ldpc_dec->k0; ops[i]->ldpc_dec.op_flags = ldpc_dec->op_flags; ops[i]->ldpc_dec.code_block_mode = ldpc_dec->code_block_mode;@@ -2171,8 +2172,10 @@ validate_op_chain(struct rte_bbdev_op_data *op,* As per definition in 3GPP 38.212 Table 5.4.2.1-2 */ static inline uint16_t -get_k0(uint16_t n_cb, uint16_t z_c, uint8_t bg, uint8_t rv_index) +get_k0(uint16_t n_cb, uint16_t z_c, uint8_t bg, uint8_t rv_index, uint16_t k0) { + if (k0 > 0) + return k0; if (rv_index == 0) return 0; uint16_t n = (bg == 1 ? N_ZC_1 : N_ZC_2) * z_c; @@ -2202,7 +2205,7 @@ compute_harq_len(struct rte_bbdev_op_ldpc_dec *ops_ld) { uint16_t k0 = 0; uint8_t max_rv = (ops_ld->rv_index == 1) ? 3 : ops_ld->rv_index; - k0 = get_k0(ops_ld->n_cb, ops_ld->z_c, ops_ld->basegraph, max_rv); + k0 = get_k0(ops_ld->n_cb, ops_ld->z_c, ops_ld->basegraph, max_rv, ops_ld->k0); /* Compute RM out size and number of rows */ uint16_t parity_offset = (ops_ld->basegraph == 1 ? 20 : 8) * ops_ld->z_c - ops_ld->n_filler; diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.c index e48947b211..8b32850982 100644 --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.c +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.c @@ -865,6 +865,10 @@ parse_ldpc_decoder_params(const char *key_token, char *token, vector->mask |= TEST_BBDEV_VF_RV_INDEX; ldpc_dec->rv_index = (uint8_t) strtoul(token, &err, 0); ret = ((err == NULL) || (*err != '\0')) ? -1 : 0; + } else if (!strcmp(key_token, "k0")) { + vector->mask |= TEST_BBDEV_VF_K0; + ldpc_dec->k0 = (uint16_t) strtoul(token, &err, 0); + ret = ((err == NULL) || (*err != '\0')) ? -1 : 0; } else if (!strcmp(key_token, "n_cb")) { vector->mask |= TEST_BBDEV_VF_NCB; ldpc_dec->n_cb = (uint16_t) strtoul(token, &err, 0); diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.h b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.h index ba1d0d20f9..9a2942132b 100644 --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.h +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.h @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ enum { TEST_BBDEV_VF_CODE_BLOCK_MODE = (1ULL << 23), TEST_BBDEV_VF_OP_FLAGS = (1ULL << 24), TEST_BBDEV_VF_EXPECTED_STATUS = (1ULL << 25), + TEST_BBDEV_VF_K0 = (1ULL << 26), };enum op_data_type {
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com> Also reporting Hemant's Ack on the cover letter as patchwork doesn't report them: Acked-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com> Thanks, Maxime
