Thanks Cunming, I'll send out v2 patch.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liang, Cunming
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 3:36 PM
> To: Liu, Yong; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/7] e1000: add rx interrupt support
>
> Hi Yong,
>
> On 9/25/2015 4:28 PM, Yong Liu wrote:
> > From: Marvin Liu <yong.liu at intel.com>
> >
> > Enable rx interrupt support on e1000 PF non-IOV mode.
> As I know, e1000 hasn't IOV mode. It's not necessary to mention PF
> non-IOV mode or not.
> In addition, it's necessary to mention the patch series is to support
> uio/vfio or both? To allow physical/emulation or both?
> >
The patch work with uio and vfio+msi mode. It support both physical device and
qemu emulated device.
This information will be added into cover letter.
> > Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong.liu at intel.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> b/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> > index 912f5dd..99beb9c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static int eth_em_flow_ctrl_get(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev,
> > static int eth_em_flow_ctrl_set(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > struct rte_eth_fc_conf *fc_conf);
> > static int eth_em_interrupt_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
> > +static int eth_em_rxq_interrupt_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
> > static int eth_em_interrupt_get_status(struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
> > static int eth_em_interrupt_action(struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
> > static void eth_em_interrupt_handler(struct rte_intr_handle *handle,
> > @@ -107,6 +108,7 @@ static void em_vlan_hw_strip_disable(struct
> rte_eth_dev *dev);
> > static void eth_em_vlan_filter_set(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > uint16_t vlan_id, int on);
> > */
> > +static void em_rxq_intr_enable(struct e1000_hw *hw);
> > static int eth_em_led_on(struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
> > static int eth_em_led_off(struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
> >
> > @@ -608,6 +610,9 @@ eth_em_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > return ret;
> > }
> > }
> > + /* check if rxq interrupt is enabled */
> > + if (dev->data->dev_conf.intr_conf.rxq != 0)
> > + eth_em_rxq_interrupt_setup(dev);
> >
> > adapter->stopped = 0;
> >
> > @@ -1276,6 +1281,39 @@ eth_em_interrupt_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > return (0);
> > }
> >
> > +/* It clears the interrupt causes and enables the interrupt.
> Comments start from next line of '/*' or '/**'?
> > + * It will be called once only during nic initialized.
> > + *
> > + * @param dev
> > + * Pointer to struct rte_eth_dev.
> > + *
> > + * @return
> > + * - On success, zero.
> > + * - On failure, a negative value.
> > + */
> > +static int
> > +eth_em_rxq_interrupt_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct e1000_hw *hw =
> > + E1000_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
> > +
> > + E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_ICR);
> > + em_rxq_intr_enable(hw);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* It enable receive packet interrupt.
> The same.
> > + * @param hw
> > + * Pointer to struct e1000_hw
> > + *
> > + * @return
> > + */
> > +static void
> > +em_rxq_intr_enable(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> > +{
> > + E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMS, E1000_IMS_RXT0);
> To make sure post-write be finished immediately, E1000_WRITE_FLUSH()
> shall add behind.
Thanks, will added into v2 patch.
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * It reads ICR and gets interrupt causes, check it and set a bit flag
> > * to update link status.
