Xie,
Please find my comments intermixed below.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Xie, Huawei <huawei.xie at intel.com> wrote:
> Thanks Pavel for this work.
> This is what we think is the better implementation for eventfd proxy, in
> our last review.
> Could you add an additional patch to remove the old implementation?
>
I'm not really sure if we should do it -- imagine upgrading from one
version of DPDK to another.
Given the current implementation there is a backward compatibility.
>
> Again, please run checkpatch.pl against your patch.
>
Oops. Thanks for pointing out.
> On 8/29/2015 2:51 AM, Pavel Boldin wrote:
>
> [...]
> > +
> > +int
> > +eventfd_init(void)
> > +{
> > + if (eventfd_link > 0)
> 0 could be valid fd. Change it to:
>
Got it. Thanks.
> if (eventfd_link >= 0)
> Change elsewhere if i miss it.
> > +int
> > +eventfd_free(void)
> > +{
> > + if (eventfd_link > 0)
> same as above:
> if (eventfd_link >= 0)
>
> [...]
>
--
Sincerely,
Pavel
