28/01/2024 10:39, Ori Kam:
> During the encapsulation of a packet, it is expected to calculate the
> hash value which is based on the original packet (the outer values,
> which will become the inner values).

It is not clear what the hash is for.

> The tunnel protocol defines which tunnel field should hold this hash,
> but it doesn't define the hash calculation algorithm.

If the hash is stored in the packet header,
I expect it to be reproducible when being checked.
How the algorithm may be undefined?

> An application that uses flow offloads gets the first few packets
> and then decides to offload the flow. As a result, there are two
> different paths that a packet from a given flow may take.
> SW for the first few packets or HW for the rest.
> When the packet goes through the SW, the SW encapsulates the packet
> and must use the same hash calculation as the HW will do for
> the rest of the packets in this flow.
> 
> This patch gives the SW a way to query the hash value
> for a given packet as if the packet was passed through the HW.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ori Kam <or...@nvidia.com>
> ---
> +Calculate encap hash
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +Calculating hash of a packet in SW as it would be calculated in HW for the 
> encap action

We should give the real full name of the flow action.

> +
> +When the HW execute an encapsulation action, it may calculate an hash value 
> which is based
> +on the original packet. This hash is stored depending on the encapsulation 
> protocol, in one
> +of the outer fields.

Give an example of such encapsulation protocol?

> +This function allows the application to calculate the hash for a given 
> packet as if the
> +encapsulation was done in HW.
> +
> +.. code-block:: c
> +
> +   int
> +   rte_flow_calc_encap_hash(uint16_t port_id,
> +                            const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
> +                                        enum rte_flow_encap_hash_field 
> dest_field,
> +                            uint8_t hash_len,
> +                            uint8_t *hash,
> +                                        struct rte_flow_error *error);

I don't think we should add the complete prototype in this guide.

[...]
> +/**
> + * @warning
> + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice.
> + *
> + * Simulates HW hash calculation that is done when encap action is being 
> used.

s/Simulates/Simulate/

> + *
> + * @param[in] port_id
> + *   Port identifier of Ethernet device.
> + * @param[in] pattern
> + *   The values to be used in the hash calculation.
> + * @param[in] dest_field
> + *   Type of destination field for hash calculation.
> + * @param[in] hash_len
> + *   The length of the hash pointer in bytes. Should be according to 
> encap_hash_field.
> + * @param[out] hash
> + *   Used to return the calculated hash. It will be written in network order,
> + *   so hash[0] is the MSB.
> + *   The number of bytes is based on the destination field type.
> + * @param[out] error
> + *   Perform verbose error reporting if not NULL.
> + *   PMDs initialize this structure in case of error only.
> + *
> + * @return
> + *   - (0) if success.
> + *   - (-ENODEV) if *port_id* invalid.
> + *   - (-ENOTSUP) if underlying device does not support this functionality.
> + *   - (-EINVAL) if *pattern* doesn't hold enough information to calculate 
> the hash
> + *               or the dest is not supported.
> + */
> +__rte_experimental
> +int
> +rte_flow_calc_encap_hash(uint16_t port_id, const struct rte_flow_item 
> pattern[],
> +                      enum rte_flow_encap_hash_field dest_field, uint8_t 
> hash_len,
> +                      uint8_t *hash, struct rte_flow_error *error);



Reply via email to