> > Hi Chaoyong, > > Please see responses inline > > > <snip> > > > > return ret; > > > } > > > > > ... > > > a/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_representor.c > > > b/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_representor.c > > > index 5f7c1fa737..63fe37c8d7 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_representor.c > > > +++ b/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_representor.c > > > @@ -792,8 +792,8 @@ nfp_flower_repr_create(struct > nfp_app_fw_flower > > > *app_fw_flower) > > > > > > /* Now parse PCI device args passed for representor info */ > > > if (pci_dev->device.devargs != NULL) { > > > - ret = rte_eth_devargs_parse(pci_dev->device.devargs->args, > > > ð_da); > > > - if (ret != 0) { > > > + ret = > > > + rte_eth_devargs_parse(pci_dev->device.devargs->args, > > > ð_da, 1); > > > + if (ret < 0) { > > > PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "devarg parse failed"); > > > return -EINVAL; > > > } > > > > Sorry, I don't quite understand why change 'ret != 0' to 'ret < 0'? > > Compare return value with 0 or NULL is the specification for our PMD, > > we prefer not to change it if don't have a good reason. > > Thanks. > > To support multiple representors under one PCI BDF, "eth_devargs args" > parameter passed to rte_eth_devargs_parse() is now an array which gets > populated with multiple "struct rte_eth_devargs" elements viz different pfvf > representor devargs. > > We are proposing a change to the return value of this API, I.e. negative means > error condition and positive value refers to no of "struct rte_eth_devargs" > elements populated. So it can't be zero, else we wont know how many > elements were populated in the array. > > Thanks > Harman >
Got it, thanks to make it clear. Then it looks good to me. > > > > > -- > > > 2.18.0