Hi Chaoyong, Please see responses inline
<snip> > > return ret; > > } > > > ... > > a/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_representor.c > > b/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_representor.c > > index 5f7c1fa737..63fe37c8d7 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_representor.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_representor.c > > @@ -792,8 +792,8 @@ nfp_flower_repr_create(struct nfp_app_fw_flower > > *app_fw_flower) > > > > /* Now parse PCI device args passed for representor info */ > > if (pci_dev->device.devargs != NULL) { > > - ret = rte_eth_devargs_parse(pci_dev->device.devargs->args, > > ð_da); > > - if (ret != 0) { > > + ret = > > + rte_eth_devargs_parse(pci_dev->device.devargs->args, > > ð_da, 1); > > + if (ret < 0) { > > PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "devarg parse failed"); > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > Sorry, I don't quite understand why change 'ret != 0' to 'ret < 0'? > Compare return value with 0 or NULL is the specification for our PMD, we > prefer not to change it if don't have a good reason. > Thanks. To support multiple representors under one PCI BDF, "eth_devargs args" parameter passed to rte_eth_devargs_parse() is now an array which gets populated with multiple "struct rte_eth_devargs" elements viz different pfvf representor devargs. We are proposing a change to the return value of this API, I.e. negative means error condition and positive value refers to no of "struct rte_eth_devargs" elements populated. So it can't be zero, else we wont know how many elements were populated in the array. Thanks Harman > > > -- > > 2.18.0