Hi Michael,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Qiu, Michael
> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 10:19 AM
> To: Iremonger, Bernard; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 02/20] librte_ether: add fields from
> rte_pci_driver to rte_eth_dev_data
> 
> On 2015/10/13 0:26, Bernard Iremonger wrote:
> > add dev_flags to rte_eth_dev_data, add macros for dev_flags.
> > add kdrv to rte_eth_dev_data.
> > add numa_node to rte_eth_dev_data.
> > add drv_name to rte_eth_dev_data.
> > use dev_type to distinguish between vdev's and pdev's.
> > remove pci_dev branches.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger at intel.com>
> 
> I have a question, if we only apply the patch set till here, does DPDK work
> fine?
> 
> Thanks,
> Michael

<snip>

The intention is to apply the complete patch set.
The PMD's will not work properly if the patches for the PMD's are not applied.

Regards,

Bernard.


Reply via email to