On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 14:01:37 +0530 Jerin Jacob <jerinjac...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 1:47 PM Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 08-Jan-24 1:28 PM, jer...@marvell.com wrote: > > > From: Jerin Jacob <jer...@marvell.com> > > > > > > Define qualification criteria for external library > > > based on a techboard meeting minutes [1] and past > > > learnings from mailing list discussion. > > > > > > [1] > > > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-June/135847.html > > > https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2024-January/284849.html > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jer...@marvell.com> > > > Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > > > > +#. **Distributions License:** > > > + > > > + - No specific constraints beyond documentation. > > > > Though we are not mandatory open distribution. However we should ask for the > > defining the distribution aspect clearly in the library. > > How about following then, > > No specific constraints, but clear documentation on distribution usage > aspects is required. > > If not, please suggest the exact wording. The wording specifies the intent here, and that is not what matters. This is not a legal document where someone will take us to court if the board doesn't accept a library.