On 12/1/2023 11:13 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 09:04:10AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 30/11/2023 19:33, Patrick Robb:
>>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 4:24 AM David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What it means:
>>>> - for the https://dpdk.org/git/dpdk repository, all the branches and
>>>> tags are mirrored to https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk as it was done so
>>>> far,
>>>> - for the https://git.dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-* repositories, only
>>>> branches named "main", "staging" or "for-*" are mirrored to
>>>> https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk with a prefix.
>>>
>>> Thank you David for clearing some of this up on the CI testing meeting. I
>>> think the final loose end was you were wondering which branches within the
>>> next-* repos we were running from. I'll paste that below:
>>>
>>> dpdk-next-crypto: for-main
>>> dpdk-next-eventdev: for-main
>>> dpdk-next-net: main
>>> dpdk-next-net-brcm: main
>>> dpdk-next-net-intel: main
>>> dpdk-next-net-mlx: main
>>> dpdk-next-net-mrvl: for-next-net
>>> dpdk-next-virtio: main
>>> dpdk-next-baseband: for-main
>>
>> We should test patches on top of the branch which is validated
>> by the tree maintainer and ready to pull.
>> This is the default branch (HEAD) of its repository on dpdk.org.
>> This is the list of equivalent GitHub branches to use for testing:
>>
>>      main
>>      next-baseband-for-main
>>      next-crypto-for-main
>>      next-eventdev-for-main
>>      next-net-for-main-repo
> 
> The (slight) inconsistency here is curious. Is there a reason why this
> branch has "repo" on the end and none of the others don't?
> 

No specific reason, it started like that in the past. If the consensus
is to go with 'for-main', I can update it.

>>      next-net-brcm-for-next-net
>>      next-net-intel-for-next-net
>>      next-net-mlx-for-next-net
>>      next-net-mrvl-for-main
>>      next-virtio-for-next-net
>>
> 
> We can also use this to produce nice graphs showing the flow through trees
> if we want. This works for me as basic graph, but can probably be cleaned
> up more:
> 
> git branch -a | awk 'BEGIN {print "digraph {"} $1 ~ /-for-/ 
> {sub(/remotes.origin./, "", $1); sub(/-repo/,"", $1); sub(/-for-/,"\" -> \"", 
> $1); print "\""$1"\""} END {print "}"}' | dot -Tpng -o trees.png
> 
> /Bruce

Reply via email to