>-----Original Message-----
>From: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
>Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2023 2:11 PM
>To: Ankur Dwivedi <adwiv...@marvell.com>
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jer...@marvell.com>
>Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 0/1] devtools: add tracepoint check in
>checkpatch
>
>30/11/2023 06:56, Ankur Dwivedi:
>> From: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
>> > 28/11/2023 15:07, Ankur Dwivedi:
>> >> > 07/03/2023 13:05, Ankur Dwivedi:
>> >> >> This patch series adds a validation in checkpatch tool to check
>> >> >> if tracepoint is present in any new function added in ethdev,
>> >> >> eventdev cryptodev and mempool library.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> v5:
>> >> >> - Copied the build_map_changes function from
>> >> >> check-symbol-change.sh
>> >to
>> >> >> check-tracepoint.sh.
>> >> >> - Added eventdev, cryptodev and mempool in libdir in check-
>> >tracepoint.sh.
>> >> >
>> >> >Why did you decide to copy the function in v5, instead of having a
>> >> >common file usable by different scripts?
>> >> >
>> >> There was comments in v2 of the patch that common scripts may not
>> >> work
>> >well and to keep the scripts specialized.
>> >
>> >I meant you can have a common file specialized in symbols.
>> The build_map_changes() (in devtools/check-symbol-change.sh) which is a
>common function can be moved to a new file named devtools/build-symbol-
>map.sh.
>> The build-symbol-map.sh can be included in check-symbol-change.sh and
>check-tracepoint.sh.
>> Please let me know if this is fine.
>
>Yes
>We can imagine moving more symbol map related funtions in this new file.
>What about symbol-map-util.sh as filename?
I am ok with this filename.
>
