> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karas, Krzysztof <krzysztof.ka...@intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2023 8:02 AM
> To: Ji, Kai <kai...@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> <pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>; Cornu, Marcel D
> <marcel.d.co...@intel.com>; Power, Ciara <ciara.po...@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Karas, Krzysztof <krzysztof.ka...@intel.com>;
> sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH v2] crypto/ipsec_mb: do not dequeue ops after flush
> 
> Previously it was possible to increment `processed_jobs` to a value greater
> than requested `nb_ops`, because after flushing at most `nb_ops` jobs the
> while loop continued, so `processed_jobs` could still be incremented and it
> was possible for this variable to be greater than `nb_ops`. If `ops` provided 
> to
> the function were only `nb_ops` long, then the `aesni_mb_dequeue_burst()`
> would write to the memory outside of `ops` array.
> 
> Fixes: b50b8b5b38f8 ("crypto/ipsec_mb: use burst API in AESNI")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Karas <krzysztof.ka...@intel.com>

Acked-by: Ciara Power <ciara.po...@intel.com>

Reply via email to