On 11/2/23 19:18, Chautru, Nicolas wrote:
Hi Maxime,

-----Original Message-----
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2023 10:00 AM
To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chau...@intel.com>; Vargas, Hernan
<hernan.var...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; gak...@marvell.com; Rix, Tom
<t...@redhat.com>; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>
Cc: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/11] test/bbdev: update python script parameters

Hi Nicolas,

On 10/27/23 22:02, Chautru, Nicolas wrote:
Hi Maxime,

Back on this discussion and there was some misunderstanding. This is really
a bug for the python script helper only.
The -t option is already reserved for bbdev-test application (and in doc) for
setting the iter_max (see main.c).
The problem is that the python script introduced -t by mistake for an
additional time out when calling the binary to be handled in the script only,
now resolving this by using -T to avoid clash with existing -t option.
No one is genuinely using -t for timeout.
Ping me if still unclear

I actually understood it from the beginning, -t was used as timeout option in
the test-bbdev.py script, this patch changes -t to now represent the maximum
number of iterations.

I'm sure you can see the problem if someone was using -t for timeout in some
CI (Neither me or you can guarantee this is not used)?

If you think we really should change the meaning of this option, we should
have a deprecation notice, have both -t and -T to represent timeout during
the deprecation period and emit a warning when -t is used. Once deprecated,
you can assign -t to max iterations.

Sounds good?

The problem with your option is that during that period of time the script is 
still broken since you cannot set the number of iterations which is what -t is 
meant for in the binary application.
This is really a fix, and until that fix is applied the python script should 
not be used, instead the binary should be called directly.
If you want to do it your suggested way and then do the formal fix in 24.03 
that is possible even if not ideal to me, but it would still mean the script 
should arguably not be used during that period of time from my point of view.

You will be able to use --iter-max during the transition period, I think it is a good compromise.

Ok for you?

Thanks,
Maxime

Let me know



Regards,
Maxime

Nic

-----Original Message-----
From: Chautru, Nicolas
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2023 8:10 AM
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>; Vargas, Hernan
<hernan.var...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; gak...@marvell.com; Rix,
Tom
<t...@redhat.com>; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>
Cc: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 02/11] test/bbdev: update python script
parameters

Hi Maxime,
In practice anyone using that API is already using the one defined in
the patch below and not using -t for time out. So not a concern to do
it properly through that patch.
Heman, any concern on your side with this change?

-----Original Message-----
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2023 11:19 AM
To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chau...@intel.com>; Vargas, Hernan
<hernan.var...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; gak...@marvell.com; Rix,
Tom
<t...@redhat.com>
Cc: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/11] test/bbdev: update python script
parameters



On 10/19/23 11:01, Chautru, Nicolas wrote:
Hi Maxime,

I believe there was some historical discrepancy, even in doc both
appeared
but none of the 2 -t options with the cap.
https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/tools/testbbdev.html
Resolving this historical issue here.

Ok, then we should fix the doc, not the code.

Thanks,
Maxime

Thanks
Nic

-----Original Message-----
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2023 9:08 PM
To: Vargas, Hernan <hernan.var...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
gak...@marvell.com; Rix, Tom <t...@redhat.com>
Cc: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chau...@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
<qi.z.zh...@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/11] test/bbdev: update python script
parameters



On 9/29/23 20:13, Hernan Vargas wrote:
Update the timeout argument and default values.
Update EAL help message and default value.
Add iter_max and snr arguments.

Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.var...@intel.com>
---
     app/test-bbdev/test-bbdev.py     | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
     app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c |  2 +-
     2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test-bbdev.py
b/app/test-bbdev/test-bbdev.py index
9cdb4659724d..8d0145076e4d
100755
--- a/app/test-bbdev/test-bbdev.py
+++ b/app/test-bbdev/test-bbdev.py
@@ -25,12 +25,12 @@ def kill(process):
                         help="specifies path to the bbdev test app",
                         default=dpdk_path + "/" + dpdk_target +
"/app/dpdk-test-
bbdev")
     parser.add_argument("-e", "--eal-params",
-                    help="EAL arguments which are passed to the test app",
-                    default="--vdev=baseband_null0")
-parser.add_argument("-t", "--timeout",
+                    help="EAL arguments which must be passed to
+ the test
app",
+                    default="--vdev=baseband_null0 -a00:00.0")
+parser.add_argument("-T", "--timeout",
                         type=int,
                         help="Timeout in seconds",
-                    default=300)
+                    default=600)
     parser.add_argument("-c", "--test-cases",
                         nargs="+",
                         help="Defines test cases to run. Run all
if not
specified") @@ -48,6 +48,14 @@ def kill(process):
                         type=int,
                         help="Operations enqueue/dequeue burst size.",
                         default=[32])
+parser.add_argument("-s", "--snr",
+                    type=int,
+                    help="SNR in dB for BLER tests",
+                    default=0)
+parser.add_argument("-t", "--iter-max",

We shouldn't change parameters meaning, it will silently break
existing scripts making use of it.

+                    type=int,
+                    help="Max iterations",
+                    default=6)
     parser.add_argument("-l", "--num-lcores",
                         type=int,
                         help="Number of lcores to run.", @@ -68,6
+76,12 @@ def kill(process):

     params.extend(["--"])

+if args.snr:
+    params.extend(["-s", str(args.snr)])
+
+if args.iter_max:
+    params.extend(["-t", str(args.iter_max)])
+
     if args.num_ops:
         params.extend(["-n", str(args.num_ops)])

diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
index 276bbf0a2e6d..faea26c10eed 100644
--- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
+++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@

     #define MAX_QUEUES RTE_MAX_LCORE
     #define TEST_REPETITIONS 100
-#define TIME_OUT_POLL 1e8
+#define TIME_OUT_POLL 1e9
     #define WAIT_OFFLOAD_US 1000

     #ifdef RTE_BASEBAND_FPGA_LTE_FEC




Reply via email to