On 9/29/23 20:13, Hernan Vargas wrote:
Renaming ACC200 macros to use generic intel vRAN Boost (VRB).
No functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.var...@intel.com>
---
app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
index faea26c10eed..d4c001de0093 100644
--- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
+++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
@@ -64,14 +64,14 @@
#define ACC100_QMGR_INVALID_IDX -1
#define ACC100_QMGR_RR 1
#define ACC100_QOS_GBR 0
-#define ACC200PF_DRIVER_NAME ("intel_acc200_pf")
-#define ACC200VF_DRIVER_NAME ("intel_acc200_vf")
-#define ACC200_QMGR_NUM_AQS 16
-#define ACC200_QMGR_NUM_QGS 2
-#define ACC200_QMGR_AQ_DEPTH 5
-#define ACC200_QMGR_INVALID_IDX -1
-#define ACC200_QMGR_RR 1
-#define ACC200_QOS_GBR 0
+#define VRBPF_DRIVER_NAME ("intel_vran_boost_pf")
+#define VRBVF_DRIVER_NAME ("intel_vran_boost_vf")
Should it be a fix, since the driver name changed in an earlier version?
