> -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 10:23 AM > To: Azarewicz, PiotrX T > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] doc: modify release notes and > deprecation notice for table and pipeline > > 2015-10-12 07:53, Azarewicz, PiotrX T: > > Hi Thomas, > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > > > Hi Maciej, > > > > > > 2015-09-11 12:31, Maciej Gajdzica: > > > > --- a/lib/librte_pipeline/rte_pipeline_version.map > > > > +++ b/lib/librte_pipeline/rte_pipeline_version.map > > > > @@ -29,3 +29,11 @@ DPDK_2.1 { > > > > rte_pipeline_table_stats_read; > > > > > > > > } DPDK_2.0; > > > > + > > > > +DPDK_2.2 { > > > > + global: > > > > + > > > > + rte_pipeline_table_entry_add_bulk; > > > > + rte_pipeline_table_entry_delete_bulk; > > > > + > > > > +} DPDK_2.1; > > > > > > The previous block was DPDK_2.0 for this library. > > > So I think you should inherit from it, not DPDK_2.1 which doesn't > > > exist in this context. > > > > The previous block was DPDK_2.1 : > > > > DPDK_2.1 { > > global: > > > > rte_pipeline_port_in_stats_read; > > rte_pipeline_port_out_stats_read; > > rte_pipeline_table_stats_read; > > > > } DPDK_2.0; > > > > So I think this patch is okay. > > Correct me if I am wrong with my understanding, please. > > You are perfectly right. > Sorry for the confusion.
No problem, thank for the answer. Piotr
