2015-10-12 07:53, Azarewicz, PiotrX T: > Hi Thomas, > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > > Hi Maciej, > > > > 2015-09-11 12:31, Maciej Gajdzica: > > > --- a/lib/librte_pipeline/rte_pipeline_version.map > > > +++ b/lib/librte_pipeline/rte_pipeline_version.map > > > @@ -29,3 +29,11 @@ DPDK_2.1 { > > > rte_pipeline_table_stats_read; > > > > > > } DPDK_2.0; > > > + > > > +DPDK_2.2 { > > > + global: > > > + > > > + rte_pipeline_table_entry_add_bulk; > > > + rte_pipeline_table_entry_delete_bulk; > > > + > > > +} DPDK_2.1; > > > > The previous block was DPDK_2.0 for this library. > > So I think you should inherit from it, not DPDK_2.1 which doesn't exist in > > this > > context. > > The previous block was DPDK_2.1 : > > DPDK_2.1 { > global: > > rte_pipeline_port_in_stats_read; > rte_pipeline_port_out_stats_read; > rte_pipeline_table_stats_read; > > } DPDK_2.0; > > So I think this patch is okay. > Correct me if I am wrong with my understanding, please.
You are perfectly right. Sorry for the confusion.
