On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 11:59:04 +0100 Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@amd.com> wrote:
> Ah, I guess it is taken as "XXXX:XXXX:XXXX" format, but number of digit > is not enforced, so "1:2:3" is a valid format, should we add this to API > documentation as example format? Or is this unintended side effect? By allowing leading zeros, it becomes allowed. DPDK always allowed the non-standard 3 part format. Looking around only old Cisco ACS used 3 part MAC format and it used periods. The API documentation should mention leading zeros are optional.
