On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 11:47 AM Gujjar, Abhinandan S <abhinandan.guj...@intel.com> wrote: >
> It is not about supporting other PMDs. > This is about keeping the test case simple with minimal conf overhead so that > it is easy for testing and maintaining. > From the code, I see that few PMDs supports NULL too without much changes to > the app. It should be ok. > > > > Also, what we have seen is, if there are other cryptodevs (like cnxk), that > > would be the first cryptodev. And the test application is only testing > > CDEV_ID > > 0. So creating a NULL crypto PMD when other PMDs are available is pointless. > Sounds good. > > Acked-by: Abhinandan Gujjar <abhinandan.guj...@intel.com> Series applied to dpdk-next-net-eventdev/for-main. Thanks
