On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 09:43:03AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > This has been around since 2021. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> > --- > lib/eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h | 1 - > lib/eal/include/generic/rte_atomic.h | 1 - > lib/eal/x86/include/rte_atomic_64.h | 1 - > 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h > b/lib/eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h > index 604791150765..5005a6dfed76 100644 > --- a/lib/eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h > +++ b/lib/eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h > @@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ __ATOMIC128_CAS_OP(__cas_128_acq_rel, "caspal") > > #endif > > -__rte_experimental > static inline int > rte_atomic128_cmp_exchange(rte_int128_t *dst, rte_int128_t *exp, > const rte_int128_t *src, unsigned int weak, int success, > diff --git a/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_atomic.h > b/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_atomic.h > index aef44e245548..1a9323dc8ad8 100644 > --- a/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_atomic.h > +++ b/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_atomic.h > @@ -1121,7 +1121,6 @@ typedef struct { > * @return > * Non-zero on success; 0 on failure. > */ > -__rte_experimental > static inline int > rte_atomic128_cmp_exchange(rte_int128_t *dst, > rte_int128_t *exp, > diff --git a/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_atomic_64.h > b/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_atomic_64.h > index 0edee8627224..e968bbf0ce65 100644 > --- a/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_atomic_64.h > +++ b/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_atomic_64.h > @@ -182,7 +182,6 @@ static inline void rte_atomic64_clear(rte_atomic64_t *v) > > /*------------------------ 128 bit atomic operations > -------------------------*/ > > -__rte_experimental > static inline int > rte_atomic128_cmp_exchange(rte_int128_t *dst, > rte_int128_t *exp,
I'm wondering if given the fluidity of changes in atomics right now we should hold this for a little while / close to the end of the merge window just in case we want to adjust it? > -- > 2.39.2