On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 09:43:03AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> This has been around since 2021.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
> ---
> lib/eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h | 1 -
> lib/eal/include/generic/rte_atomic.h | 1 -
> lib/eal/x86/include/rte_atomic_64.h | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h
> b/lib/eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h
> index 604791150765..5005a6dfed76 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h
> +++ b/lib/eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h
> @@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ __ATOMIC128_CAS_OP(__cas_128_acq_rel, "caspal")
>
> #endif
>
> -__rte_experimental
> static inline int
> rte_atomic128_cmp_exchange(rte_int128_t *dst, rte_int128_t *exp,
> const rte_int128_t *src, unsigned int weak, int success,
> diff --git a/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_atomic.h
> b/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_atomic.h
> index aef44e245548..1a9323dc8ad8 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_atomic.h
> +++ b/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_atomic.h
> @@ -1121,7 +1121,6 @@ typedef struct {
> * @return
> * Non-zero on success; 0 on failure.
> */
> -__rte_experimental
> static inline int
> rte_atomic128_cmp_exchange(rte_int128_t *dst,
> rte_int128_t *exp,
> diff --git a/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_atomic_64.h
> b/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_atomic_64.h
> index 0edee8627224..e968bbf0ce65 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_atomic_64.h
> +++ b/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_atomic_64.h
> @@ -182,7 +182,6 @@ static inline void rte_atomic64_clear(rte_atomic64_t *v)
>
> /*------------------------ 128 bit atomic operations
> -------------------------*/
>
> -__rte_experimental
> static inline int
> rte_atomic128_cmp_exchange(rte_int128_t *dst,
> rte_int128_t *exp,
I'm wondering if given the fluidity of changes in atomics right now we
should hold this for a little while / close to the end of the merge
window just in case we want to adjust it?
> --
> 2.39.2
