On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 12:37:40 +0200 Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Indeed! > > On 3/31/23 12:34, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > We missed this patch, there was no comment. > > Please review. > > > > 10/03/2022 18:59, luca.bocca...@gmail.com: > >> From: Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> > >> > >> Allow more flexibility with embargo lifting by not requiring > >> mentions of CVEs in commit messages if the lift date allows > >> it. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> > >> --- > >> -The CVE id and the bug id must be referenced in the patch. > >> +The CVE id and the bug id must be referenced in the patch if there is no > >> +embargo, or if there is an embargo, but it will be lifted when the release > >> +including the patch is published. If the embargo is going to be lifted > >> after the > >> +release, then the CVE and bug ids must be omitted from the commit > >> message. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com> Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
