29/06/2023 17:40, David Marchand: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 5:31 PM Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote: > > 29/06/2023 15:58, David Marchand: > > > - .tx_queue = RTE_BE16(0xffff), > > > + .tx_queue = 0xffff, > > > > As I said in an earlier comment about the same issue, > > UINT16_MAX would be better. > > I don't mind updating (or maybe Ferruh can squash this directly ?) but > there are lots of uint16_t fields initialised with 0xffff in this same > file.
It can be made in a separate patch for all occurences. First I would like to get some comments, what do you prefer between 0xffff and UINT16_MAX?
