On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 4:59 PM Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com> wrote: > > - patch 4, 5 and 6 go together, with patch 6 being the fix itself. I > > understand it was easier to review as splitted patches, but maybe it > > would be simpler to squash them to make the backport trivial. > > If possible I would prefer to keep them as separate patches, it will be > much easier to understand the code in the future if a regression > happened. > > I'll help the LTS maintainer with backporting it (i.e. request to also > pick patch 5 and 5).
4* > > Does that work for you? Ok for me. -- David Marchand