Hi > -----Original Message----- > From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@amd.com> > Sent: Monday, May 22, 2023 1:28 PM > > On 5/18/2023 10:48 PM, Alexander Kozyrev wrote: > > Introduce the new rte_flow_update() API allowing users > > to update the action list in the already existing rule. > > If the API is only to update actions, does make sense to rename it to > explicitly state this, like: > `rte_flow_action_update()` > > Same for async version of the API. >
I'm O.K with the suggested name. Maybe just change action to actions? Best, Ori > > Flow rules can be updated now without the need to destroy > > the rule first and create a new one instead. > > A single API call ensures that no packets are lost by > > guaranteeing atomicity and flow state correctness. > > The rte_flow_async_update() is added as well. > > The matcher is not updated, only the action list is. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kozyrev <akozy...@nvidia.com> > > <...>
