> -----Original Message-----
> From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.anan...@huawei.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 4:41 AM
> To: Fengchengwen <fengcheng...@huawei.com>; Stephen Hemminger
> <step...@networkplumber.org>; Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.w...@arm.com>
> Cc: Ashok Kaladi <ashok.k.kal...@intel.com>; jer...@marvell.com;
> tho...@monjalon.net; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> s.v.naga.haris...@intel.com; erik.g.carri...@intel.com;
> abhinandan.guj...@intel.com; sta...@dpdk.org; nd <n...@arm.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] ethdev: fix race condition in fast-path ops setup
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: fengchengwen <fengcheng...@huawei.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 1:07 AM
> > To: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>; Ruifeng Wang
> > <ruifeng.w...@arm.com>
> > Cc: Ashok Kaladi <ashok.k.kal...@intel.com>; jer...@marvell.com;
> > tho...@monjalon.net; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> > s.v.naga.haris...@intel.com; erik.g.carri...@intel.com;
> > abhinandan.guj...@intel.com; sta...@dpdk.org; nd <n...@arm.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ethdev: fix race condition in fast-path ops
> > setup
> >
> > On 2023/2/22 1:00, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 07:24:19 +0000
> > > Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.w...@arm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: fengchengwen <fengcheng...@huawei.com>
> > >>> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2023 2:58 PM
> > >>> To: Ashok Kaladi <ashok.k.kal...@intel.com>; jer...@marvell.com;
> > >>> tho...@monjalon.net
> > >>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; s.v.naga.haris...@intel.com;
> > >>> erik.g.carri...@intel.com; abhinandan.guj...@intel.com;
> > >>> sta...@dpdk.org; Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.w...@arm.com>
> > >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ethdev: fix race condition in fast-path
> > >>> ops setup
> > >>>
> > >>> On 2023/2/20 14:08, Ashok Kaladi wrote:
> > >>>> If ethdev enqueue or dequeue function is called during
> > >>>> eth_dev_fp_ops_setup(), it may get pre-empted after setting the
> > >>>> function pointers, but before setting the pointer to port data.
> > >>>> In this case the newly registered enqueue/dequeue function will
> > >>>> use dummy port data and end up in seg fault.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This patch moves the updation of each data pointers before
> > >>>> updating corresponding function pointers.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Fixes: c87d435a4d79 ("ethdev: copy fast-path API into separate
> > >>>> structure")
> > >>>> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Why is something calling enqueue/dequeue when device is not fully
> started.
> > > A correctly written application would not call rx/tx burst until
> > > after ethdev start had finished.
> >
> > Please refer the eb0d471a894 (ethdev: add proactive error handling
> > mode), when driver recover itself, the application may still invoke
> enqueue/dequeue API.
>
> Right now DPDK ethdev layer *does not* provide synchronization
> mechanisms between data-path and control-path functions.
> That was a deliberate deisgn choice. If we want to change that rule, then I
> suppose we need a community consensus for it.
+1
Any such synchronization typically requires using load-acquire on data plane,
which brings down the performance. But, init time synchronization would not
affect the performance (stating the obvious).
> I think that if the driver wants to provide some sort of error recovery
> procedure, then it has to provide some synchronization mechanism inside it
> between data-path and control-path functions.
> Actually looking at eb0d471a894 (ethdev: add proactive error handling
> mode), and following patches I wonder how it creeped in?
> It seems we just introduced a loophole for race condition with this
> approach...
> It probably needs to be either deprecated or reworked.
>
> >
> > >
> > > Would something like this work better?
> > >
> > > Note: there is another bug in current code. The check for link state
> > > interrupt and link_ops could return -ENOTSUP and leave device in
> indeterminate state.
> > > The check should be done before calling PMD.
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c index
> > > 0266cc82acb6..d6c163ed85e7 100644
> > > --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > > +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > > @@ -1582,6 +1582,14 @@ rte_eth_dev_start(uint16_t port_id)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + if (dev->data->dev_conf.intr_conf.lsc == 0 &&
> > > + dev->dev_ops->link_update == NULL) {
> > > + RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(INFO,
> > > + "Device with port_id=%"PRIu16" link update not
> supported\n",
> > > + port_id);
> > > + return -ENOTSUP;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > ret = rte_eth_dev_info_get(port_id, &dev_info);
> > > if (ret != 0)
> > > return ret;
> > > @@ -1591,9 +1599,7 @@ rte_eth_dev_start(uint16_t port_id)
> > > eth_dev_mac_restore(dev, &dev_info);
> > >
> > > diag = (*dev->dev_ops->dev_start)(dev);
> > > - if (diag == 0)
> > > - dev->data->dev_started = 1;
> > > - else
> > > + if (diag != 0)
> > > return eth_err(port_id, diag);
> > >
> > > ret = eth_dev_config_restore(dev, &dev_info, port_id); @@ -1611,16
> > > +1617,18 @@ rte_eth_dev_start(uint16_t port_id)
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - if (dev->data->dev_conf.intr_conf.lsc == 0) {
> > > - if (*dev->dev_ops->link_update == NULL)
> > > - return -ENOTSUP;
> > > - (*dev->dev_ops->link_update)(dev, 0);
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > /* expose selection of PMD fast-path functions */
> > > eth_dev_fp_ops_setup(rte_eth_fp_ops + port_id, dev);
> > >
> > > + /* ensure state is set before marking device ready */
> > > + rte_smp_wmb();
> > > +
> > > rte_ethdev_trace_start(port_id);
> > > +
> > > + /* Update current link state */
> > > + if (dev->data->dev_conf.intr_conf.lsc == 0)
> > > + (*dev->dev_ops->link_update)(dev, 0);
> > > +
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > .
> > >
