>-----Original Message-----
>From: lihuisong (C) <lihuis...@huawei.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 2:38 PM
>To: He, ShiyangX <shiyangx...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.z...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org; Singh, Aman
>Deep <aman.deep.si...@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
><yuying.zh...@intel.com>; Burakov, Anatoly <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>;
>Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun...@intel.com>; Alvin Zhang <alvinx.zh...@intel.com>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix secondary process not forwarding
>
>
>在 2023/2/21 10:52, He, ShiyangX 写道:
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: lihuisong (C) <lihuis...@huawei.com>
>>> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2023 8:46 PM
>>> To: He, ShiyangX <shiyangx...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>>> Cc: Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.z...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org; Singh,
>>> Aman Deep <aman.deep.si...@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
>>> <yuying.zh...@intel.com>; Burakov, Anatoly
>>> <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>; Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun...@intel.com>;
>>> Alvin Zhang <alvinx.zh...@intel.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix secondary process not
>>> forwarding
>>>
>>>
>>> 在 2022/12/30 15:55, Shiyang He 写道:
>>>> Under multi-process scenario, the secondary process gets queue state
>>>> from the wrong location (the global variable 'ports'). Therefore,
>>>> the secondary process can not forward since "stream_init" is not called.
>>>>
>>>> This commit fixes the issue by calling 'rte_eth_rx/tx_queue_info_get'
>>>> to get queue state from shared memory.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: a78040c990cb ("app/testpmd: update forward engine beginning")
>>> should use this commit:
>>> Fixes: 3c4426db54fc ("app/testpmd: do not poll stopped queues")
>> Thanks for your comments, I will ask maintainer to help fix this problem.
>>
>>>> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Shiyang He <shiyangx...@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c index
>>>> 134d79a555..2c73daf9eb 100644
>>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
>>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
>>>> @@ -2378,9 +2378,34 @@ start_packet_forwarding(int with_tx_first)
>>>> if (!pkt_fwd_shared_rxq_check())
>>>> return;
>>>>
>>>> - if (stream_init != NULL)
>>>> - for (i = 0; i < cur_fwd_config.nb_fwd_streams; i++)
>>>> + if (stream_init != NULL) {
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < cur_fwd_config.nb_fwd_streams; i++) {
>>>> + if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
>>> directly use "rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_SECONDARY"?
>> The following action should be executed for all non-primary processes.
>"all non-primary processes" is which processes? it's only 'secondary'
>here, not 'auto', right?
>>
>>>> + struct fwd_stream *fs = fwd_streams[i];
>>>> + struct rte_eth_rxq_info rx_qinfo;
>>>> + struct rte_eth_txq_info tx_qinfo;
>>>> + int32_t rc;
>>>> + rc = rte_eth_rx_queue_info_get(fs->rx_port,
>>>> + fs->rx_queue, &rx_qinfo);
>>>> + if (!rc)
>>>> + ports[fs->rx_port].rxq[fs-
>>>> rx_queue].state =
>>>> + rx_qinfo.queue_state;
>>>> + else
>>>> + TESTPMD_LOG(WARNING,
>>>> + "Failed to get rx queue
>>> info\n");
>>>> +
>>>> + rc = rte_eth_tx_queue_info_get(fs->tx_port,
>>>> + fs->tx_queue, &tx_qinfo);
>>>> + if (!rc)
>>>> + ports[fs->tx_port].txq[fs-
>>>> tx_queue].state =
>>>> + tx_qinfo.queue_state;
>>>> + else
>>>> + TESTPMD_LOG(WARNING,
>>>> + "Failed to get tx queue
>>> info\n");
>>> not all PMDs implement rte_eth_rx/tx_queue_info_get() to query the
>>> state, right?
>>> Can you set this state to 'START' if the return value is '-ENOTSUP'?
>> If pmd doesn't implement "rte_eth_rx/tx_queue_info_get()" to query
>queue state, should use the default value instead of modifying the state,
>because it may be modified elsewhere.
>The rx/tx_queue_start/stop() can change Rx/Tx queue state if PMD supports
>this API.
>In primary, if PMD doesn't support this API, this queue state do not be
>changed and still be the original value(RTE_ETH_QUEUE_STATE_STARTED)
>start_port() sets.
>However, in secondary, Rx/Tx queue state have not been initialized, your
>patch also do not it.
>Namely, their default values are wrong.
>
>Our plan needs to ensure that the PMDs that do not support
>rx/tx_queue_start/stop() or rx/tx_queue_info_get() can forward in
>secondary.
>
>I think we either add the initialization of queue state in start_port() or
>somewhere else, or make sure it's ok here.
Thanks for your comment, the v2 patch will be sent soon!
>>>> + }
>>>> stream_init(fwd_streams[i]);
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> port_fwd_begin = cur_fwd_config.fwd_eng->port_fwd_begin;
>>>> if (port_fwd_begin != NULL) {
