>-----Original Message-----
>From: lihuisong (C) <lihuis...@huawei.com>
>Sent: Monday, February 20, 2023 8:46 PM
>To: He, ShiyangX <shiyangx...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.z...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org; Singh, Aman
>Deep <aman.deep.si...@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
><yuying.zh...@intel.com>; Burakov, Anatoly <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>;
>Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun...@intel.com>; Alvin Zhang <alvinx.zh...@intel.com>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix secondary process not forwarding
>
>
>在 2022/12/30 15:55, Shiyang He 写道:
>> Under multi-process scenario, the secondary process gets queue state
>> from the wrong location (the global variable 'ports'). Therefore, the
>> secondary process can not forward since "stream_init" is not called.
>>
>> This commit fixes the issue by calling 'rte_eth_rx/tx_queue_info_get'
>> to get queue state from shared memory.
>>
>> Fixes: a78040c990cb ("app/testpmd: update forward engine beginning")
>should use this commit:
>Fixes: 3c4426db54fc ("app/testpmd: do not poll stopped queues")
Thanks for your comments, I will ask maintainer to help fix this problem.
>> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shiyang He <shiyangx...@intel.com>
>> ---
>> app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c index
>> 134d79a555..2c73daf9eb 100644
>> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
>> @@ -2378,9 +2378,34 @@ start_packet_forwarding(int with_tx_first)
>> if (!pkt_fwd_shared_rxq_check())
>> return;
>>
>> - if (stream_init != NULL)
>> - for (i = 0; i < cur_fwd_config.nb_fwd_streams; i++)
>> + if (stream_init != NULL) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < cur_fwd_config.nb_fwd_streams; i++) {
>> + if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
>
>directly use "rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_SECONDARY"?
The following action should be executed for all non-primary processes.
>
>> + struct fwd_stream *fs = fwd_streams[i];
>> + struct rte_eth_rxq_info rx_qinfo;
>> + struct rte_eth_txq_info tx_qinfo;
>> + int32_t rc;
>> + rc = rte_eth_rx_queue_info_get(fs->rx_port,
>> + fs->rx_queue, &rx_qinfo);
>> + if (!rc)
>> + ports[fs->rx_port].rxq[fs-
>>rx_queue].state =
>> + rx_qinfo.queue_state;
>> + else
>> + TESTPMD_LOG(WARNING,
>> + "Failed to get rx queue
>info\n");
>> +
>> + rc = rte_eth_tx_queue_info_get(fs->tx_port,
>> + fs->tx_queue, &tx_qinfo);
>> + if (!rc)
>> + ports[fs->tx_port].txq[fs-
>>tx_queue].state =
>> + tx_qinfo.queue_state;
>> + else
>> + TESTPMD_LOG(WARNING,
>> + "Failed to get tx queue
>info\n");
>not all PMDs implement rte_eth_rx/tx_queue_info_get() to query the state,
>right?
>Can you set this state to 'START' if the return value is '-ENOTSUP'?
If pmd doesn't implement "rte_eth_rx/tx_queue_info_get()" to query queue state,
should use the default value instead of modifying the state, because it may be
modified elsewhere.
>> + }
>> stream_init(fwd_streams[i]);
>> + }
>> + }
>>
>> port_fwd_begin = cur_fwd_config.fwd_eng->port_fwd_begin;
>> if (port_fwd_begin != NULL) {
