-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru>
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2023 17:21
To: Rongwei Liu <rongw...@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Matan Azrad
<ma...@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko <viachesl...@nvidia.com>; Ori Kam
<or...@nvidia.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL)
<tho...@monjalon.net>
Cc: Raslan Darawsheh <rasl...@nvidia.com>; Aman Singh
<aman.deep.si...@intel.com>; Yuying Zhang <yuying.zh...@intel.com>;
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@amd.com>; Olivier Matz <olivier.m...@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] ethdev: add IPv6 routing extension header
definition
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
On 1/31/23 12:36, Rongwei Liu wrote:
Add IPv6 routing extension header definition and no TLV support for
now.
At rte_flow layer, there are new items defined for matching
type/nexthdr/segments_left field.
Add command line support for IPv6 routing extension header
matching: type/nexthdr/segment_list.
Signed-off-by: Rongwei Liu <rongw...@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Ori Kam <or...@nvidia.com>
---
app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst | 9 +++++
doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_03.rst | 9 +++++
lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c | 19 +++++++++++
lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h | 21 ++++++++++++
lib/net/rte_ip.h | 19 +++++++++++
6 files changed, 123 insertions(+)
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
index 88108498e0..7a8516829c 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
@@ -298,6 +298,10 @@ enum index {
ITEM_IPV6_SRC,
ITEM_IPV6_DST,
ITEM_IPV6_HAS_FRAG_EXT,
+ ITEM_IPV6_ROUTING_EXT,
+ ITEM_IPV6_ROUTING_EXT_TYPE,
+ ITEM_IPV6_ROUTING_EXT_NEXT_HDR,
+ ITEM_IPV6_ROUTING_EXT_SEG_LEFT,
ITEM_ICMP,
ITEM_ICMP_TYPE,
ITEM_ICMP_CODE,
@@ -1326,6 +1330,7 @@ static const enum index next_item[] = {
ITEM_ARP_ETH_IPV4,
ITEM_IPV6_EXT,
ITEM_IPV6_FRAG_EXT,
+ ITEM_IPV6_ROUTING_EXT,
ITEM_ICMP6,
ITEM_ICMP6_ND_NS,
ITEM_ICMP6_ND_NA,
@@ -1435,6 +1440,15 @@ static const enum index item_ipv6[] = {
ITEM_IPV6_SRC,
ITEM_IPV6_DST,
ITEM_IPV6_HAS_FRAG_EXT,
+ ITEM_IPV6_ROUTING_EXT,
+ ITEM_NEXT,
+ ZERO,
+};
+
+static const enum index item_ipv6_routing_ext[] = {
+ ITEM_IPV6_ROUTING_EXT_TYPE,
+ ITEM_IPV6_ROUTING_EXT_NEXT_HDR,
+ ITEM_IPV6_ROUTING_EXT_SEG_LEFT,
ITEM_NEXT,
ZERO,
};
@@ -3844,6 +3858,38 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
.args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY_BF(struct rte_flow_item_ipv6,
has_frag_ext, 1)),
},
+ [ITEM_IPV6_ROUTING_EXT] = {
+ .name = "ipv6_routing_ext",
+ .help = "match IPv6 routing extension header",
+ .priv = PRIV_ITEM(IPV6_ROUTING_EXT,
+ sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_ipv6_routing_ext)),
+ .next = NEXT(item_ipv6_routing_ext),
+ .call = parse_vc,
+ },
+ [ITEM_IPV6_ROUTING_EXT_TYPE] = {
+ .name = "ext_type",
+ .help = "match IPv6 routing extension header type",
+ .next = NEXT(item_ipv6_routing_ext,
NEXT_ENTRY(COMMON_UNSIGNED),
+ item_param),
+ .args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY_HTON(struct
rte_flow_item_ipv6_routing_ext,
+ hdr.type)),
+ },
+ [ITEM_IPV6_ROUTING_EXT_NEXT_HDR] = {
+ .name = "ext_next_hdr",
+ .help = "match IPv6 routing extension header next header type",
+ .next = NEXT(item_ipv6_routing_ext,
NEXT_ENTRY(COMMON_UNSIGNED),
+ item_param),
+ .args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY_HTON(struct
rte_flow_item_ipv6_routing_ext,
+ hdr.next_hdr)),
+ },
+ [ITEM_IPV6_ROUTING_EXT_SEG_LEFT] = {
+ .name = "ext_seg_left",
+ .help = "match IPv6 routing extension header segment left",
+ .next = NEXT(item_ipv6_routing_ext,
NEXT_ENTRY(COMMON_UNSIGNED),
+ item_param),
+ .args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY_HTON(struct
rte_flow_item_ipv6_routing_ext,
+ hdr.segments_left)),
+ },
[ITEM_ICMP] = {
.name = "icmp",
.help = "match ICMP header", diff --git
a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
index 3e6242803d..602fab29d3 100644
--- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
@@ -1544,6 +1544,15 @@ Matches Color Marker set by a Meter.
- ``color``: Metering color marker.
+Item: ``IPV6_ROUTING_EXT``
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+Matches IPv6 routing extension header.
+
+- ``next_hdr``: Next layer header type.
+- ``type``: IPv6 routing extension header type.
+- ``segments_left``: How many IPv6 destination addresses carries on.
+
Actions
~~~~~~~
diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_03.rst
b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_03.rst
index c15f6fbb9f..1337da73b8 100644
--- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_03.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_03.rst
@@ -69,6 +69,11 @@ New Features
``rte_event_dev_config::nb_single_link_event_port_queues`` parameter
required for eth_rx, eth_tx, crypto and timer eventdev adapters.
+* **Added rte_flow support for matching IPv6 routing extension header
+fields.**
+
+ Added ``ipv6_routing_ext`` items in rte_flow to match IPv6 routing
+ extension header.
+
Removed Items
-------------
@@ -98,6 +103,10 @@ API Changes
Also, make sure to start the actual text at the margin.
=======================================================
+* net: added a new structure:
+
+ - IPv6 routing extension header ``rte_ipv6_routing_ext``.
+
ABI Changes
-----------
diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c index
7d0c24366c..833382c466 100644
--- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
+++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
@@ -76,6 +76,23 @@ rte_flow_item_flex_conv(void *buf, const void *data)
return src->length;
}
+static size_t
+rte_flow_item_ipv6_routing_ext_conv(void *buf, const void *data) {
+ struct rte_flow_item_ipv6_routing_ext *dst = buf;
+ const struct rte_flow_item_ipv6_routing_ext *src = data;
+ size_t len;
+
+ if (src->hdr.hdr_len)
Please, compare vs 0
+ len = src->hdr.hdr_len << 3;
+ else
+ len = src->hdr.segments_left << 4;
+ if (dst == NULL)
+ return 0;
+ memcpy(dst->segments, src->segments, len);
+ return len;
+}
+
/** Generate flow_item[] entry. */
#define MK_FLOW_ITEM(t, s) \
[RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ ## t] = { \ @@ -157,6 +174,8 @@ static
const struct rte_flow_desc_data rte_flow_desc_item[] = {
MK_FLOW_ITEM(L2TPV2, sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_l2tpv2)),
MK_FLOW_ITEM(PPP, sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_ppp)),
MK_FLOW_ITEM(METER_COLOR, sizeof(struct
rte_flow_item_meter_color)),
+ MK_FLOW_ITEM_FN(IPV6_ROUTING_EXT, sizeof(struct
rte_flow_item_ipv6_routing_ext),
+ rte_flow_item_ipv6_routing_ext_conv),
};
/** Generate flow_action[] entry. */ diff --git
a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h index
b60987db4b..ff9270690c 100644
--- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
+++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
@@ -624,6 +624,13 @@ enum rte_flow_item_type {
* See struct rte_flow_item_meter_color.
*/
RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_METER_COLOR,
+
+ /**
+ * Matches the presence of IPv6 routing extension header.
+ *
+ * @see struct rte_flow_item_ipv6_routing_ext.
+ */
+ RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV6_ROUTING_EXT,
};
/**
@@ -873,6 +880,20 @@ struct rte_flow_item_ipv6 {
uint32_t reserved:23;
};
+/**
+ * @warning
+ * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this structure may change without prior notice
+ *
+ * RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV6_ROUTING_EXT.
+ *
+ * Matches an IPv6 routing extension header.
+ */
+struct rte_flow_item_ipv6_routing_ext {
+ struct rte_ipv6_routing_ext hdr;
+ __extension__
+ rte_be32_t segments[]; /**< Each hop IPv6 address. */
Do we really need it? Are you going to support it?
Will testpmd and flow conf work correctly since it uses size of the structure?
