On 11/17/2022 6:25 PM, Hanumanth Pothula wrote:
Validate ethdev parameter 'max_rx_mempools' to know wheater device
supports multi-mempool feature or not.

Spell check: whether

Bugzilla ID: 1128

Signed-off-by: Hanumanth Pothula <hpoth...@marvell.com>

Tested-by: Aman Singh <aman.deep.si...@intel.com>

v2:
  - Rebased on tip of next-net/main
---
  app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 8 +++++++-
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
index 4e25f77c6a..fd634bd5e6 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
@@ -2655,16 +2655,22 @@ rx_queue_setup(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t rx_queue_id,
        union rte_eth_rxseg rx_useg[MAX_SEGS_BUFFER_SPLIT] = {};
        struct rte_mempool *rx_mempool[MAX_MEMPOOL] = {};
        struct rte_mempool *mpx;
+       struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info;
        unsigned int i, mp_n;
        uint32_t prev_hdrs = 0;
        int ret;
+ ret = rte_eth_dev_info_get(port_id, &dev_info);
+       if (ret != 0)
+               return ret;
+
        /* Verify Rx queue configuration is single pool and segment or
         * multiple pool/segment.
+        * @see rte_eth_dev_info::max_rx_mempools
         * @see rte_eth_rxconf::rx_mempools
         * @see rte_eth_rxconf::rx_seg
         */
-       if (!(mbuf_data_size_n > 1) && !(rx_pkt_nb_segs > 1 ||
+       if (!(dev_info.max_rx_mempools != 0) && !(rx_pkt_nb_segs > 1 ||

Can we make the check simpler "(dev_info.max_rx_mempools == 0)"

            ((rx_conf->offloads & RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_BUFFER_SPLIT) != 0))) {
                /* Single pool/segment configuration */
                rx_conf->rx_seg = NULL;

Reply via email to