Hi, Is there any other work/changes required for this patch to be submitted?
Thanks On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 7:53 PM Andrew Rybchenko < andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru> wrote: > On 8/8/22 13:39, Joyce Kong wrote: > > Hi Huzaifa, > > > > This patch looks good to me. > > And would you please help review my memif patches? > > > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/cover/20220701102815.1444223-1-joyce.k...@arm.com/ > > > > Thanks, > > Joyce > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: huzaifa.rahman <huzaifa.rah...@emumba.com> > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 6:16 PM > >> To: jgraj...@cisco.com > >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; huzaifa.rahman <huzaifa.rah...@emumba.com> > >> Subject: [PATCH] memif: memif driver does not crashes when there's > >> different N of TX and RX queues > > net/memif: fix memif crash with different Tx Rx queues > > > >> > >> Bugzilla ID: 734 > >> > >> there's a bug in memif_stats_get() function due to confusion between C2S > >> (client->server) and S2C (server->client) rings, causing a crash if > there's a > >> different number of RX and TX queues. > >> > >> this is fixed by selectiing the correct rings for RX and TX i.e for RX, > S2C rings > >> are selected and for TX, C2S rings are selected. > >> > > Fixes: 09c7e63a71f9 ("net/memif: introduce memory interface PMD") > > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org > > > >> Signed-off-by: huzaifa.rahman <huzaifa.rah...@emumba.com> > > Reviewed-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.k...@arm.com> > > Fixed above on applying. > > Applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks. > > >
