04/07/2022 12:35, Morten Brørup пишет:
Does anyone here remember why the __rte_ring_enqueue/dequeue_elems_64/128() 
functions support unaligned object arrays, when the 
__rte_ring_enqueue/dequeue_elems_32() functions require 4 byte aligned object 
arrays?

As I remember, we added 'unaligned' to be able to use rte_ring with elements that might have smaller alignment.
For 32 - as I remember we never explicitly require 4B aligned
objects for the rings ... Am I missing something here?
My guess, we just never hit such problem so it gets unnoticed.
Probably worth updating 32-bit version too with explicit 'unaligned' type.



I'm wondering if the compiler could do better with a simpler implementation 
than the manually implemented loop unrolls, and if the unalignment silliness 
would stand in the way.

Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards,
-Morten Brørup


Reply via email to