On Sat, 25 Jun 2022 01:13:01 +0200 qcqx-obaq.6cba8...@hashmail.org wrote: > To whom it may concern. > > usertools/dpdk-devbind.py currently does not recognize interfaces > that are part of a bond as active. > that can be a nuisance if you are using something like libmoon which > proactively rebinds drivers for all "not active" interfaces. > > yes, i am aware of the dpdk contribution guideline. > > no, i am not going to jump through linux-kernel level hoops for > a trivial 9-sloc-python driveby-contrib. > > yes, that glorious code is all written by me, i promise i didnt > steal it, and whoever takes pity and merges it is free to claim > full credits for it. > (if you feel bad about claiming credits for something you didnt > write, perhaps find more useful names for "f" and "l" and/or > add some comment above it...) > > yes, i promise i will read and respect the contrib guide if i ever > want to contrib code that took longer to write than it takes to > read the contrib guide. > > regards, > x23
Sounds like a libmoon bug, not a DPDK bug. There are many more types of joined devices in Linux, and just doing bonding seems wrong. Also, since your patch is missing Signed-off-by with a valid name, it can not be accepted.
