Hi, thomas What about this patch?
Thanks, Michael On 4/16/2015 4:09 PM, Chen, Jing D wrote: > Hi, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Michael Qiu [mailto:qiudayu at cn.ibm.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 5:25 PM >> To: dev at dpdk.org >> Cc: Chen, Jing D; Qiu, Michael >> Subject: [PATCH] librte_pmd_fm10k: Fix max_vfs issue in fm10k PMD >> >> From: Michael Qiu <michael.qiu at intel.com> >> >> In DPDK, max_vfs means vf numbers created, not the max number vfs >> the device supported. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Qiu <michael.qiu at intel.com> >> --- >> lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c >> b/lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c >> index 0312fad..297ff88 100644 >> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c >> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c >> @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ fm10k_dev_infos_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, >> dev_info->max_tx_queues = hw->mac.max_queues; >> dev_info->max_mac_addrs = 1; >> dev_info->max_hash_mac_addrs = 0; >> - dev_info->max_vfs = FM10K_MAX_VF_NUM; >> + dev_info->max_vfs = dev->pci_dev->max_vfs; >> dev_info->max_vmdq_pools = ETH_64_POOLS; >> dev_info->rx_offload_capa = >> DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM | >> -- >> 1.9.3 > Acked-by Jing Chen <jing.d.chen at intel.com> > >
