On 6/1/2015 9:47 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-05-12 05:30, Qiu, Michael: >> Hi, thomas >> >> What about this patch? > It seems this patch was not *really* sent to dev at dpdk.org. > Please re-send, keeping the Acked-by line.
OK, I will resend it. Thanks, Michael >> On 4/16/2015 4:09 PM, Chen, Jing D wrote: >>> From: Michael Qiu [mailto:qiudayu at cn.ibm.com] >>>> From: Michael Qiu <michael.qiu at intel.com> >>>> >>>> In DPDK, max_vfs means vf numbers created, not the max number vfs >>>> the device supported. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Qiu <michael.qiu at intel.com> >>>> --- >>>> lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c >>>> b/lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c >>>> index 0312fad..297ff88 100644 >>>> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c >>>> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c >>>> @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ fm10k_dev_infos_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, >>>> dev_info->max_tx_queues = hw->mac.max_queues; >>>> dev_info->max_mac_addrs = 1; >>>> dev_info->max_hash_mac_addrs = 0; >>>> - dev_info->max_vfs = FM10K_MAX_VF_NUM; >>>> + dev_info->max_vfs = dev->pci_dev->max_vfs; >>>> dev_info->max_vmdq_pools = ETH_64_POOLS; >>>> dev_info->rx_offload_capa = >>>> DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM | >>>> -- >>>> 1.9.3 >>> Acked-by Jing Chen <jing.d.chen at intel.com> > >
