> From: David Marchand [mailto:david.march...@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 21 June 2022 16.13 > > ALIGNMENT_MASK is only used internally. > Besides it lacks a DPDK-related prefix. > Hide it from external eyes. > > Reported-by: Morten Brørup <m...@smartsharesystems.com> > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> > --- > lib/eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h > b/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h > index 18aa4e43a7..b678b5c942 100644 > --- a/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h > +++ b/lib/eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h > @@ -851,6 +851,8 @@ rte_memcpy(void *dst, const void *src, size_t n) > return rte_memcpy_generic(dst, src, n); > } > > +#undef ALIGNMENT_MASK > + > #if defined(RTE_TOOLCHAIN_GCC) && (GCC_VERSION >= 100000) > #pragma GCC diagnostic pop > #endif > -- > 2.36.1 >
You could consider also giving another name with a lower risk of collision. However, I think the risk is very low, since it can only collide with other headers being included before this header file, so this suffices. Reviewed-by: Morten Brørup <m...@smartsharesystems.com>
