On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:22 PM Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> 21/06/2022 11:49, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 11:42:55AM +0200, Stanisław Kardach wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 11:39 AM Bruce Richardson
> > > <bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > <snip>
> > > > Generally the "cpp" binary is not the c-plus-plus one, but the C
> > > > preprocessor one. Perhaps the original files are incorrect here, and 
> > > > should
> > > > all refer to g++.
> > > >
> > > > /Bruce
> > > >
> > > That does make sense. I'll submit a separate patchset fixing all
> > > occurrences (of which there are many).
> > >
> >
> > As a more general note for future consideration, I notice that in meson
> > 0.56 the cross-file support has been enhanced with the ability to use
> > constants and therefore separate out prefixes.[1]
> >
> > When we get to the point where we feel we can mandate meson 0.56 upwards
> > for cross compilation, we should look to leverage this. It should even
> > allow other scripts such as test-meson-builds to auto-generate the constant
> > paths to the binaries on the fly, effectively allowing the use of
> > environment variables for these - something previously requested by Thomas.
>
> That would be great.
> Cross compilation prefix is such a basic thing, we should handle it properly.
Please correct me if I'm wrong but it seems that meson's approach to
cross-compiling is to package all settings into cross-files. Probably
under assumption that a repeatable compilation is more important than
flexibility and that there are compiler-specific knobs that need/can
to be tuned. Therefore reading CROSS_COMPILE/prefix from environment
is intentionally made hard.

So should the direction be environment or rather separating
cross-files into arch-part and toolchain-parts and letting user create
his own toolchain part while maintaining a matrix of supported
combinations for CI? I'm not advocating either, just want to wrap my
head around it.

>
> > [1] https://mesonbuild.com/Machine-files.html#constants
>
>
>

Reply via email to